Very long time readers of
this weblog will likely be acquainted with this chart, of UK actual GDP per capita
since simply after WWII.
It reveals a
remarkably fixed pattern rise of output/revenue per head of two.25% per
annum since 1955. The booms of the mid-70s and end-80s, and the
recessions of the early 80s are solely simply seen, however fortunately the
pattern in GDP per capita all the time reasserted itself. Till, after all,
the interval after the World Monetary Disaster, when it didn’t in a
fairly spectacular means.
Not solely did we not
bounce again in any means from that recession, however GDP per head began
rising extra slowly. (These observations are a lot clearer when
utilizing GDP per head, relatively than GDP which is strongly influenced by
inward migration.) I watched and blogged in horror because the hole between
the earlier pattern and what was truly occurring to residing
requirements  stored rising wider.
The little blip at
the top is the pandemic after all, and as soon as once more utilizing GDP per head
reveals clearly how we’re but to completely get well by way of residing
requirements. On the finish of 2021 GDP per head was nearly 4% decrease than
it was in 2019. (As soon as once more, it reveals how deceptive utilizing GDP information
is in case you are attempting to gauge something to do with welfare.)
Remarkably GDP per head on the finish of 2021 was solely round 5.5%
increased than it was on the finish of 2007! (That’s annual development of much less
Nevertheless, utilizing a
fixed pattern fee of development of two.25% as a reference level was a
comfort relatively than a sensible aspiration. The primary motive is
that pattern development has for a while been slowing down throughout the
world. What to make use of as an alternative? Within the chart beneath, I examine the UK to
the worldwide technological chief, america. I make no try
to make a sensible comparability of ranges of revenue per head, which is
in any case distorted by components like employees within the US have much less
holidays than we do in europe, for instance. I’m simply involved with
the pattern fee of development in GDP per capita.
I’ve scaled US GDP
per capita (crimson line) in order that it matches the extent of UK GDP per
capita from the mid-50s till the mid-80s. UK and US
residing requirements have been rising at an analogous fee over that interval.
There was a lot angst within the UK on the time about financial decline,
however that partly mirrored a dynamic Europe, and likewise we weren’t
catching up with what is usually agreed is a big degree’s hole
with the US. You may see by eye that US pattern development in GDP per capita begins to say no as we attain the center of the interval.
fascinating deviation from parity of development charges begins within the
mid-80s, and is clearer if I redraw the chart beginning in 1979.
UK GDP per capita continued to develop at a continuing fee within the Eighties and Nineteen Nineties, whereas US GDP per capita development began to say no from the late Eighties. This divergence grew wider through the interval of the Labour
authorities, such that by the top of 2007 we have been forward of the US
pattern by 6% in comparison with earlier ranges. You may inform many tales
about this obvious success story, however it does correlate with extra
detailed research of developments in development over this era: the UK was
greater than holding its personal, and catching up in degree’s phrases with
the US and to some extent France and Germany.
However that’s simply the
backdrop to the primary level of this submit. Because the GFC, the UK has
been doing worse than the US persistently, reversing the entire
post-mid 80s features. Half of the 6% acquire was misplaced throughout that essential
austerity interval from 2010-12. In fact all international locations across the
world did badly via a typical coverage of austerity after 2010, with
the necessary exception of China. Solely in China was a substantial
Keynesian growth created that offset the impression of
the GFC. However, in comparison with the US, the UK misplaced floor.
The subsequent main
interval of UK decline started shortly after the Brexit referendum. By
the top of 2019, that preliminary 2007 6% acquire had fallen to little over
1%. The coverage response within the pandemic made it worse nonetheless. By the
finish of 2021 the UK had fallen to only over 2% beneath the US line,
reflecting a stronger (stimulus led) US restoration from the pandemic.
If we take the interval from the beginning of 2010 till the top of 2021 as
an entire, UK GDP per capita seems to have grown by 6% lower than US
GDP per capita. That’s, since 1955, an unprecedented interval of
financial decline for the UK.
To point out this isn’t
an artefact of my methodology, here’s a small desk
Within the desk I’ve
included information for Germany (the one main EU nation with information for
2021 on Eurostat). Germany can also be falling behind the US, however by much less
than the UK. The reason being easy – Germany can also be addicted
to an austerity mindset.
That is the fact
behind the federal government’s bluster of robust and regular development.
Macroeconomic success must be measured by way of GDP per head, and never
the dimensions of some authorities deficit. Overlook cherry picked statistics
after the UK suffered the biggest fall in GDP through the preliminary
pandemic. That is the fact – an unprecedented decade of relative
macroeconomic decline that began in 2010, and with Brexit nonetheless
influencing development there isn’t any finish in sight.
This evaluation ties
within the underlying development within the economic system, taking out the direct impression
of migration, with the UK’s so
referred to as price of residing disaster. These usually are not separate
issues, however as Rachel Reeves highlighted in a current
speech they’ve a typical trigger, which is weak UK
development. The federal government can’t on the identical time seem fatalistic
about falling residing requirements and but attempt to speak up UK financial
efficiency, as a result of to take action is mutually contradictory. Advancing
residing requirements, notably these on the backside of the revenue
distribution, is what good administration of the economic system is all about.
It’s all the time
comparatively straightforward to seek out explanation why this UK macroeconomic decline is
all unhealthy luck, and nothing to do with coverage. It all the time is. However since
the Conservatives got here to energy in 2010 they’ve had two massive
financial concepts which straight affect macroeconomic efficiency.
The primary was prioritising decreasing the deficit over the restoration
from the GFC recession and, extra lately, the pandemic recession.
The second was Brexit. Each have been disastrous for the economic system, and
predictably in order they went in opposition to primary financial ideas.
There’s a refusal
amongst Conservative MPs and ministers to recognise the current actuality
of UK macroeconomic decline we are actually residing via (and its
distinction to our earlier robust efficiency), not to mention their
duty for it. As an alternative they reside in a fantasy world, and check out
to persuade us their fantasy is actual. Aside from the common use of
cherry picked and deceptive statistics, we’ve a state of affairs the place
the queues of lorries ready to be checked at Dover are nothing to
do with Brexit, they inform us, however due to EU crimson tape. You
wouldn’t need such individuals answerable for essentially the most trivial duties, let
alone managing the economic system. It’s time to recognise the fact of
current UK macroeconomic decline, and to assign duty for it in two enormous failures of financial coverage.
 GDP per head is
equal to the typical revenue generated by home output per
head. In fact that common is hiding the gradual redistribution
of revenue in the direction of the 1% within the Eighties and Nineteen Nineties, a redistribution
which has had a vital
impression on median wage development throughout that interval.
Lastly the buying energy of median UK earnings has declined
due to two current depreciations in sterling: the primary through the
GFC and the second after the Brexit referendum.